Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Interbond Corporation of America v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 0:2011cv62437
Plaintiff:
Interbond Corporation of America
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd, Hitachi America, Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 9:2011cv81263
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Defendant:
Hitachi, Ltd., Hitachi Displays, Ltd., Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Tech Data Corporation et al v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 8:2011cv02454
Plaintiff:
Tech Data Corporation and Tech Data Product Management, Inc.
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Apple Inc. et al
as 6:2011cv01512
Plaintiff:
Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Motorola Mobility Holdings, Inc., Research in Motion Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Interbond Corporation of America v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 0:2011cv61264
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, AU Optronics Corporation America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Interbond Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Office Depot, Inc. v. AU Optronics Corporation et al
as 9:2011cv80349
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corporation, Au Optronics Corporation America, Inc., Chi Mei Optoelectronics Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Defrancisco v. AU Optronics Corp. et al
as 0:2007cv60323
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Defrancisco and Mauricio Defrancisco
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp. America, CHI MEI Optoelectronics Co., LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0025 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
