Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Cosmo Technologies Limited et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Technologies Limited and Santarus Inc.
Defendant:
Lupin Ltd. and Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cosmo Technologies Limited et al v. Alvogen Pine Brook LLC
as 1:2015cv00193
Defendant:
Alvogen Pine Brook LLC and Alvogen Pine Brook Inc.
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Technologies Limited, Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Valeant Pharmaceuticals Luxembourg S.A.R.L. and others
Not Yet Classified:
Norwich Pharma Services
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cosmo Technologies Limited et al v. Actavis Laboratories FL Inc.
as 1:2015cv00164
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Technologies Limited and Santarus Inc.
Defendant:
Actavis Laboratories FL Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cosmo Technologies Limited et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
as 1:2015cv00116
Plaintiff:
Cosmo Technologies Limited and Santarus Inc.
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Cosmo Technologies Limited and Santarus Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Santarus Inc. et al v. Mylan Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Santarus Inc. and Veloxis Pharmaceuticals A/S
Defendant:
Mylan Inc. and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Santarus Inc. and Veloxis Pharmaceuticals A/S
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Santarus Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
as 1:2007cv00827
Plaintiff:
Santarus Inc. and Curators of the University of Missouri
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Santarus Inc. et al v. Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
as 1:2007cv00551
Plaintiff:
Santarus Inc. and Curators of the University of Missouri
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
