Cases 1 - 5 of 5
NRDC v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 17-70817
Petitioner:
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Respondent:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
State of North Dakota v. EPA, et al
as 17-1080
Petitioner:
State of North Dakota
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Arkansas v. EPA, et al
as 17-1079
Petitioner:
State of Arkansas
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt, in his Official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al
as 17-1053
Petitioner:
State of Texas and Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, E. Scott Pruitt, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and Catherine McCabe, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
State of North Dakota, et al v. Scott Pruitt, et al
as 15-15894
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SIERRA CLUB and NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL
Intervenor-Plaintiff - Appellant:
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, STATE OF ARIZONA, COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, Energy and Environment Cabinet and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT PRUITT, in his official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency and REGINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Amicus Curiae:
STATES OF NEBRASKA, ALABAMA, ALASKA, ARKANSAS, FLORIDA, GEORGIA, IDAHO, INDIANA, KANSAS, LOUISIANA, MICHIGAN, OHIO, OKLAHOMA, SOUTH CAROLINA, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN AND WYOMING.
Amicus Curiae - Pending:
UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMEREN MISSOURI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
