Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Service v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03827
Plaintiff:
Darryl Service
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sikorski, v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02178
Plaintiff:
Sandra Sikorski
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Ruud v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv06813
Plaintiff:
Gary Ruud
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Chaidez v. Astrue
as 4:2012cv04024
Plaintiff:
Roman Sanchez Chaidez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Linda A. Moran v. Michael J. Astrue
as 1:2011cv08846
Plaintiff:
Linda A. Moran and Service List
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Conner v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv08736
Plaintiff:
Vonetta Conner
Defendant:
Michael Astrue and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383
Moncada v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv06590
Plaintiff:
Denise L. Moncada
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Butterfield Health Care II, Inc. v. Leavitt et al
as 1:2008cv03604
Petitioner:
Butterfield Health Care II, Inc., Butterfield Health Care II, Inc. and Butterfield Health Care II, Inc.
Respondent:
Michael Leavitt, Kerry Weems, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Heiman v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 3:2007cv03136
Plaintiff:
Alan B Heiman
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Voigt v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 3:2007cv00050
Plaintiff:
Nadine Voigt
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Health and Human Services and Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
