Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Haley v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 2:2015cv00682
Plaintiff:
Katherine Haley
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Lacombe v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation dba Glaxosmithkline
as 2:2011cv01093
Plaintiff:
Carla LaCombe
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Murray v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, a Pennsylvania corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00457
Plaintiff:
Rose A Murray and Rose A Murray
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, a Pennsylvania corporation, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare L.L.C., a Pennsylvania Limited Liability Company, Glaxosmithkline Consumer Healthcare, L.P., a Pennsylvania Limited Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gonzalez v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, a Pennsylvania corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00254
Plaintiff:
Lisa Gonzalez
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, a Pennsylvania corporation and Dwan Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Boggs et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, a Pennsylvania corporation et al
as 3:2009cv00253
Plaintiff:
William Boggs and Shirley Boggs
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline, a Pennsylvania corporation, GlaxoSmithKline plc, an English public limited company, Glaxo Wellcome UK Ltd., Uxbridge, Middlesex, UK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Braegelmann v Smithkline Beecham Corp
as 2:2008cv01476
Plaintiff:
Teri J Braegelmann
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, Southern Nevada Adult Mental Health and State of Nevada, Mahakian and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
