Cases 31 - 40 of 84
COSBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2014cv02095
Plaintiff:
LEONA COSBY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Chris Stovic v. RRRB, et al
as 14-1251
Petitioner:
Chris Stovic
Respondent:
Railroad Retirement Board and Social Security Administration
MURPHY v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and JANE & JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wanda Kyler v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-5258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wanda A. Kyler
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party - Appellee:
Social Security Administration
Ernest Cost v. SSA
as 14-5164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest A. Cost
Defendant - Appellee:
Social Security Administration
Ronald Foster v. Carolyn Colvin
as 14-5110
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald C. Foster
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Social Security Administration
PRAKASH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv01511
Plaintiff:
JAI PRAKASH
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MITCHELL JENKINS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv01500
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH JEAN MITCHELL JENKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv00843
Plaintiff:
COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
SUAREZ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2013cv00778
Plaintiff:
HUGO ABSALON SUAREZ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
