Cases 1 - 10 of 33
MCCAIN vs. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2023cv03288
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN MCCAIN and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
PODLUCKY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv02153
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOSEPH PODLUCKY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
FOURSTAR v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2021cv02818
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, JR.
Defendant:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ANGIE WAGNER, DEWAYNE HABERSHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TYREE v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC. et al
as 1:2019mc00038
Respondent:
SHELBY COUNTY, SHELBY COUNTY GENERAL SESSIONS, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and others
Petitioner:
MAURICE TYREE
TYREE v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00015
Respondent:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and others
Petitioner:
RUTHA TYREE
TYREE v. DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC et al
as 1:2019mc00014
Respondent:
DITECH FINANCIAL, LLC, MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, SHELL POINT MORTGAGE SERVICING and others
Petitioner:
RUTHA TYREE
ANOMNACHI v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2017mc02708
Plaintiff:
GORDY ANOMNACHI
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: MS:MiscOrd
COSBY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2014cv02095
Plaintiff:
LEONA COSBY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
MURPHY v. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY et al
as 1:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and JANE & JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRAKASH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2013cv01511
Plaintiff:
JAI PRAKASH
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
