Cases 41 - 50 of 53
RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES et al
as 1:2011cv01387
Plaintiff:
RAUL RODRIGUEZ-CERVANTES
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NICHOLSON v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv02010
Plaintiff:
PATRICK NICHOLSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
KIM v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv01740
Plaintiff:
TERESA K. KIM
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
CRUMMEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv01560
Plaintiff:
BRENT EDWARD CRUMMEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BROWN v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv01487
Plaintiff:
BRIAN ANTHONY BROWN
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COLBERT v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv01437
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO COLBERT
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IVEY v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv00656
Plaintiff:
JONISHA IVEY
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIEL v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2010cv00345
Plaintiff:
HABTAMU DANIEL
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
YUAN v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF SHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES et al
as 1:2010cv00344
Plaintiff:
CHING YUI YUAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF SHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES and UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
WALTERS v. ASTRUE et al
as 1:2009cv00956
Plaintiff:
CHRIS WALTERS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE and SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
