Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Pressmark Publishing LLC v. EYP Publishing LLC et al
as 2:2025cv00274
Plaintiff:
Pressmark Publishing LLC
Defendant:
EYP Publishing LLC and Sourcebooks LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Penguin Random House, et al v. Chair, Orange County School Board, et al
as 25-13191
Plaintiff:
PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE, HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS LLC and others
Defendant:
CHAIR, ORANGE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, ANGIE GALLO, MARIA SALAMANCA and others
Penguin Random House, et al v. Chair, Florida State Board of Education, et al
as 25-13181
Plaintiff:
PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE, HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS LLC and others
Defendant:
CHAIR, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, VICE CHAIR, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, ESTHER BYRD and others
Unknown:
SERVICE and READ FREELY ALABAMA
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF ARKANSAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Penguin Random House, LLC, et al. v. Labrador, et al.
as 25-5361
Plaintiff:
PENGUIN RANDOM HOUSE, LLC, HACHETTE BOOK GROUP, INC., HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS, LLC and others
Defendant:
RAUL LABRADOR, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Idaho, JAN M BENNETTS, in her official capacity as Ada County Prosecuting Attorney, JUSTIN COLEMAN, in his official capacity as Nez Perce County Prosecuting Attorney and others
Penguin Random House LLC, et al. v. Labrador, et al.
as 1:2025cv00061
Plaintiff:
Penguin Random House LLC, Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollinss Publishers LLC and others
Defendant:
Raul Labrador, Jan Bennetts, Justin Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Penguin Random House LLC et al v. Gibson et al
as 6:2024cv01573
Plaintiff:
Sourcebooks LLC, Laurie Halse Anderson, The Authors Guild and others
Defendant:
Pam Gould, Alicia Farrant, Grazie P Christie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
