Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Mickles v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 1:2022cv21329
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, State of Alabama and State of Georgia
Respondent:
Congress Terri Harris @ Library of Congress, General Motor, Warren Michigan and Satelite/Planet GM @ Onstar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
State of Florida et al v. Walensky et al
as 8:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALASKA and others
Defendant:
ROCHELLE P WALENSKY, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, SHERRI A BERGER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
France et al v. Health Management Associates, Inc.
as 8:2013cv01264
Defendant:
Health Management Associates, Inc.
Petitioner:
USA
Interested Party:
State of Florida, State of Texas, State of Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
Gretchen Miscik and Anita France
Not Classified By Court:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Sakli v. Deutsche Bank-Board of Governors et al
as 6:2012cv00567
Plaintiff:
Adnan Sakli
Defendant:
Deutsche Bank -Board of Governors, Bank of America Board of Governors, Wells Fargo Board of Governors and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Kramer v. Walgreen Co.
as 8:2008cv01917
Plaintiff:
Ken Kramer
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., CVS Caremark Corporation, Publix Super Markets, Inc. and others
Movant:
United States of America , State of California, State of Delaware and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
United States of America et al v. Eisai, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv22302
Plaintiff:
United States of America , Michael Keeler , State of California and others
Defendant:
Eisai, Inc., 100 Tice Blvd., Woodcliff Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
SOUTHEAST FEDERAL v. CALDERA, et al
as 3:2008cv00640
Plaintiff:
SOUTHEAST FEDERAL POWER CUSTOMERS, INC. and City of Apalachicola, Florida
Defendant:
LOUIS CALDERA , JOSEPH E. WESTPHAL , ROBERT B. FLOWERS and others
Intervenor:
State of Georgia , COBB COUNTY MARIETTA WATER AUTHORITY , DeKalb County and others
Amicu:
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION and AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
Cross_defendant:
LOUIS CALDERA, JOSEPH E. WESTPHAL, ROBERT B. FLOWERS and others
Cross_claimant:
State of Georgia and GWINNETT COUNTY
Movant:
MIDDLE CHATTAHOOCHEE RIVER USERS and LAKE LANIER ASSOCIATION, INC.
Intervenor_defendant:
Lake Lanier Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
United States of America et al v. Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.
as 8:2008cv01691
Plaintiff:
United States of America , State of New York, State Of Florida and others
Defendant:
Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
State Of Alabama et al v. United States Army Corps of Engineers et al
as 3:2007cv00249
Plaintiff:
State Of Alabama, State Of Alabama, State Of Alabama and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Water Works and Sanitary Sewer Board of the City of Montgomery and Albama Power Company
Defendant:
United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers, United States Army Corps of Engineers and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Georgia, State of Georgia, State of Georgia and others
Amicu:
Sierra Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
State Of Florida v. United States Fish and Wildlife Service et al
as 3:2007cv00250
Plaintiff:
State Of Florida, State Of Florida, State Of Florida and others
Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Gail Carmody and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Cross Claimant:
State of Georgia, State of Georgia, State of Georgia and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Georgia, Atlanta Regional Commission and City of Atlanta, Georgia
Cross Defendant:
United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Gail Carmody, United States Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Maritime Subsidy Board
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
