Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Allergan, Inc., et al
as 21-80005
Respondent: STATE OF HAWAII, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF IOWA and others
Petitioner: ALLERGAN SALES, LLC, ALLERGAN USA, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and others
Richard Mark, et al v. Shamir USA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56280
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: SHAMIR USA, INC., SHAMIR OPTICAL INDUSTRY, LTD., SHAMIR OPTICA HOLDINGS A.C.S. LTD. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RICHARD MARK, Relator; ex rel United States of America
State of California, et al v. USEPA, et al
as 20-16606
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, STATE OF TENNESSEE, STATE OF OHIO and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL SACKETT, Proposed Defendant-Intervenors and CHANTELL SACKETT
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Dr. Falk Pharma GmbH, et al
as 20-16256
Not Classified By Court: ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellant: DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH
Plaintiff / Appellee: ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
Zachary Silbersher, et al v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals Intern, et al
as 20-16176
Not Classified By Court: ADAMAS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC., SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD., DR. FALK PHARMA GMBH and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ZACHARY SILBERSHER, Relator
State of Washington, et al v. DOS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-35391
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls, CORDELL HULL, BUREAU OF INDUSTRY AND SECURITY and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: FREDRIC'S ARMS & SMITHS, LLC and NATIONAL SHOOTING SPORTS FOUNDATION, INC.
State of Washington, et al v. Second Amendment Foundation, et al
as 20-35064
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., CONN WILLIAMSON and SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
Benjamin Barber v. State of Oregon, et al
as 20-35051
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO, STATE OF LOUISIANA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: BENJAMIN BARBER
Defendant: SIMON, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon and ACOSTA, Hon. Judge; For the US District Court for the District of Oregon
State of Washington, et al v. Defense Distributed, et al
as 20-35030
Plaintiff / Appellee: STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant / Appellant: DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED
Defendant: DIRECTORATE OF DEFENSE TRADE CONTROLS, US DEPARTMENT OF STATE, MIKE MILLER, in his official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense Trade Controls and others
The Dan Abrams Company LLC, et al v. Medtronic Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-56377
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF NEVADA, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Defendant / Appellee: MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK DEGGENDORF GMBH, MEDTRONIC SOFAMOR DANEK USA, INC., WARSAW ORTHOPEDIC, INC. and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE DAN ABRAMS COMPANY LLC, Relator

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?