Cases 1 - 10 of 364
Florer v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
as 24-2591
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FLORER
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, LITHIA FORD OF BOISE, RHETT SHEEDER and others
Stuart Robinson v. Clise Properties, Inc.
as 24-2604
Plaintiff:
BARBARA A. STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
CLISE PROPERTIES, INC.
Spencer v. Pulido-Esparza, et al.
as 24-2444
Plaintiff:
EDWARD B. SPENCER
Defendant:
L. PULIDO-ESPARZA, Correctional Officer at SATF, C. SMITH, Correctional Lieutenant at SATF, STUART SHERMAN, Warden at SATF and others
Stuart v. City of Scottsdale, et al.
as 24-2386
Plaintiff:
MARK STUART, an Individual and Chairman doing business as Save Our Preserve Incorporated doing business as Save Our Preserve Political Action Committee of Scottsdale
Defendant:
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a Municipal Corporation and a political subdivision of the State of Arizona, TOM CLEARY, JASON GLENN and others
Robinson v. State of Washington
as 24-1772
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Robinson v. Human Services Campus Incorporated
as 24-1551
Plaintiff:
BARBARA STUART ROBINSON
Defendant:
HUMAN SERVICES CAMPUS INCORPORATED
Shuler v. Scott, et al.
as 24-248
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RANDALL SHULER
Defendant / Appellee:
STUART J. SCOTT, Honorable, Judge Santa Clar County Superior Court, THEODORE C. ZAYNER, Honorable, Judge Santa Clara County Superior Court and DREW C. TAKAICHI, Honorable, Judge Santa Clara County Superior Court
United States of America v. Seugasala
as 24-78
Defendant / Appellant:
STUART T. SEUGASALA and Tone
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Seugasala
as 24-44
Defendant / Appellant:
STUART T. SEUGASALA and Tone
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Douglas v. Pearlstein, et al.
as 23-4303
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAMEION DOUGLAS
Defendant / Appellee:
A. PEARLSTEIN, KURUNA THOMPSON, MELISSA DAVIDSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
