Cases 1 - 10 of 14
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION et al v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR et al
as 1:2011cv00130
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION , WILDEARTH GUARDIANS , GRAND CANYON TRUST and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Intervenor_defendant:
SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURE IMPROVEMENT AND POWER DISTRICT , ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY and CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 0706
Northern CA Power Agency v. FERC
as 09-1156
Petitioner:
Northern California Power Agency
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., City of Burbank, California, City of Glendale, California and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, People of the State of California and others
Arizona Public Service Company v. FERC
as 08-1354
Petitioner:
Arizona Public Service Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
El Paso Electric Company, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, El Paso Municipal Customer Group and others
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
El Paso Natural Gas Company, Gila River Power, L.P., UNS Gas, Inc. and others
Freeport-McMoran Corporation v. FERC
as 08-1349
Petitioner:
Freeport-McMoRan Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
El Paso Electric Company, Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District and El Paso Municipal Customer Group
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
El Paso Natural Gas Company, Gila River Power, L.P., Southern California Gas Company and others
Town of Buckeye, Arizona v. FERC
as 08-1126
Petitioner:
Town of Buckeye, Arizona, Stardust-Tartesso W-12, Inc. and WVSV Holdings, L.L.C.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor For Respondent:
Arizona Public Service Company and Transwestern Pipeline Company
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District
IDACORP Engy v. FERC
as 04-1145
Petitioner:
IDACORP Energy L.P.
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
California Independent System Operator Corporation, City of Santa Clara, California, City of Redding, California and others
AZ Corp Cmsn, et al v. FERC
as 03-1206
Petitioner:
Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc., El Paso Electric Company and others
Terminated Party:
Arizona Gas Division of Citizens Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Arizona Public Service Company, Pinnacle West Energy Corporation, Pacific Gas and Electric Company and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Southwest Gas Corporation and BHP Copper Inc.
Assn Amer RR v. STB, et al
as 01-1213
Petitioner:
Association of American Railroads
Respondent:
Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Intervenor:
Edison Electric Institute, PPL Montana, LLC, National Grain and Feed Association and others
Intervenor For Respondent:
National Industrial Transportation League
Pub Util Cmsn St CA v. FERC
as 99-1390
Petitioner:
Public Utilities Commission of the State of California
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
El Paso Municipal Customer Group, Amoco Production Company, Citizens Utilities Company and others
:
Assn Amer RR v. STB, et al
as 99-1354
Petitioner:
Association of American Railroads
Respondent:
Surface Transportation Board and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
National Industrial Transportation League, The Fertilizer Institute, PP&L, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
National Grain and Feed Association, U.S. Clay Producers Traffic Association, Inc., Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
