Cases
In re Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Securities Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv03461
Plaintiff: pl Pablo Elizondo and Ilene Richman
Consolidated Plaintiff: DR. Ehsan Afshani, Tikva Bochner, Thomas Draft and others
Lead Plaintiff: Arkansas Teachers Retirement System, Pension Funds, Plumbers and Pipefitters Pension Group and others
Defendant: Lloyd C. Blankfein, Gary D. Cohn, Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and others
Consolidated Defendant: Sarah E. Smith
Petitioner: Montana Board of Investments, Metzler Investment GmbH and Sampension KP Livsforsikring A/S
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 78
IN RE: Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities Litigation
as 1:2009md02027
In Re: IN RE: Satyam Computer Services, Ltd., Securities Litigation
Lead Plaintiff: The Global Institutional Investor, Sampension KP Livsforsikring A/S, SKAGEN AS and others
Plaintiff: Aberdeen Claims Administration, Inc., Trustee for Aberdeen Claims Trust and Aberdeen Claims Trust II
Consolidated Plaintiff: Wayne Lau, Aekta Ben Patel, Hossein Momenzadeh and others
Petitioner: Priyanka Arora, Integre Advisors, Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada and others
Defendant: Maytas Infra Limited, Maytas Properties, Byrraju Teja Raju and others
Consolidated Defendant: B. Rama Raju, B. Ramalinga Raju, Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patel v. Satyam Computer Services Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00093
Defendant: B. Rama Raju, Satyam Computer Services Ltd. and B. Ramalinga Raju
Plaintiff: Aekta Ben Patel and Wayne Lau
Petitioner: Labourers' Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada, Priyanka Arora, Integre Advisors and others
Lead Plaintiff: The Global Institutional Investor, Sampension KP Livsforsikring A/S, SKAGEN AS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?