Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Timothy Johnson, et al v. Diakon Logistics, et al
as 21-2886
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON and DARRYL MOORE
Defendant / Appellee:
DIAKON LOGISTICS, WILLIAM C. JARNAGIN, JR. and INNOVEL SOLUTIONS, INC., formerly known as SEARS LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Timothy Johnson, et al v. Diakon Logistics, et al
as 20-8004
Defendant:
INNOVEL SOLUTIONS, INC., formerly known as Sears Logistics Services, Inc.; formerly known as Sears Roebuck and Co.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TIMOTHY JOHNSON and DARRYL MOORE
Defendant / Appellant:
DIAKON LOGISTICS and WILLIAM C. JARNAGIN, JR.
Sears Protection Company, et al v. Nina Greene, et al
as 18-8014
Petitioner:
SEARS PROTECTION COMPANY and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Respondent:
NINA GREENE and GERALD GREENE
Sears Protection Company, et al v. Nina Greene, et al
as 18-8014
Petitioner:
SEARS PROTECTION COMPANY and SEARS ROEBUCK AND CO.
Respondent:
GERALD GREENE and NINA GREENE
Kevin Barnes, et al v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 16-3554
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KEVIN BARNES, LARRY BUTLER, JOSEPH LEONARD and others
Defendant - Appellant:
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
Intervenor - Appellant:
WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION
Oaks v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2015cv11318
Plaintiff:
Michael Oaks
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Native American Arts, Inc. v. Overstock.com Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv04332
Plaintiff:
Native American Arts, Inc.
Defendant:
Overstock.com Inc., Sears Holdings Corporation, Sears, Roebuck and Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eye v. Sears Roebuck And Co.
as 1:2011cv04894
Plaintiff:
Marty L. Eye
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck And Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Native American Arts, Inc. v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.
as 1:2009cv00117
Plaintiff:
Native American Arts, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears, Roebuck and Co.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
