Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Defined Contribution Pension Plan et al v. Rues Mechanical P & H, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00881
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Defined Contribution Pension Plan , Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Family Health Plan and Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Joint Apprenticeship Trust Fund
Defendant:
Rues Mechanical P & H, Inc. and R & M Construction, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Family Health Plan, et al v. Mares Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc.
as 1:2011cv00898
Defendant:
Mares Plumbing & Mechanical, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Family Health Plan , Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Defined Contribution Pension Plan and Trustees of the Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Joint Apprenticeship Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Health and Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Design Build HVAC LLC et al
as 1:2010cv01209
Defendant:
Design Build HVAC LLC , Joseph T Diesel and Deborah Diesel
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Family Health Plan , Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Defined Contribution Pension Plan , Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Joint Apprenticeship Trust Fund and others
Counter_claimant:
Design Build HVAC LLC
Counter_defendant:
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Family Health Plan et al v. Dixon Corporation
as 1:2009cv00973
Plaintiff:
Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Family Health Plan, Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Defined Contribution Pension Plan and Sheet Metal Workers Local Union 49 Joint Apprenticeship Trust Fund
Defendant:
Dixon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
