Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Dorna Sports, S.L. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations, Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Dorna Sports, S.L.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations, Identified on Schedule A Hereto, CXJQ Store, DaMaStart Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv05864
Plaintiff:
Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 2022 New store Store, 3D clothing source manufacturers Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Royer Brands International S.A.R.L. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04879
Plaintiff:
Royer Brands International S.A.R.L.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Fujian Qiha Ha Network Technology Co., Ltd., Guangdong Zebra Jewelry Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Eicher Motors Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv04458
Plaintiff:
Eicher Motors Limited
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, AgroMarket TheChivas, Albert Farmer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
