Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Jones v. Singh et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Darlene Jones
Defendant:
Jagdeep Singh, Timonthy Holme, Kevin Hettrich and others
Baker v. Romano et al
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Lewis D. Baker
Defendant:
Pasquale Romano, Rick Wilmer, Roxanne Bowman and others
Singh et al v. FCA U.S. LLC
as 1:2023cv01227
Plaintiff:
Anshuman Singh, Theresa Clark, Jeremy Erskine and others
Defendant:
Stellantis N.V. and FCA U.S. LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Wilhelm v. Sovos Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Sovos Brands, Inc., William R. Johnson, Todd R. Lachman and others
CCM Associates II LLC v. Channel Control Merchants LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
CCM Associates II LLC
Defendant:
Channel Control Merchants LLC, HDC Holdings II, LLC, KKR & Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
BMO Harris Bank N.A. v. M & P Logistics Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00903
Plaintiff:
BMO Harris Bank N.A.
Defendant:
M & P Logistics Inc. and Kulwant Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sornchai et al v. Girouard et al
as 1:2023cv00253
Plaintiff:
Rev. Adam Sornchai and Ronald Green
Defendant:
Dave Girouard, Jeff Huber, Kerry Cooper and others
Nominal Defendant:
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
Singh v. Illusory Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Mannu Singh
Defendant:
Illusory Systems, Inc., Archetype Crypto II, LLC, Consensys Software, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hsu v. Girouard et al
as 1:2023cv00132
Plaintiff:
Chia Chih Hsu
Defendant:
David Girouard, Sanjay Datta, Jeff Huber and others
Nominal Defendant:
Upstart Holdings, Inc.
Wilhelm v. Paya Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Robert Wilhelm
Defendant:
Paya Holdings Inc., Aaron Cohen, Jeffrey Hack and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
