Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Gene Collins, et al v. Laborers International Union o, et al
as 21-16819
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENE COLLINS, DBA Southern Nevada Flaggers & Barricades
Plaintiff:
SIX STAR CLEANING & CARPET SERVICE, INC., YOLANDA WOODS, FLOPPY MOP, INC. and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL NO 872, LABORERS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL NO 702 and TOMMY WHITE
Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust et al v. Six Star Cleaning & Carpet Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00160
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust, Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Joint Pension Trust, Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Vacation Trust and others
Defendant:
Burke Construction Group, Inc., CBRE, Inc., Clark Construction Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Laborers International Union of North America Local No 872 v. Six Star Cleaning & Carpet Service, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00930
702) 452-4262 (fax:
Laborers International Union of North America Local No 872
Defendant:
Six Star Cleaning & Carpet Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Collins et al v. Laborers International Union of North America Local No 872 et al
as 2:2011cv00524
Counter Defendant:
Blue Chip Enterprises, Inc., Gene Collins, Floppy Mop, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Blue Chip Enterprises, Inc., Gene Collins, Floppy Mop, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Laborers International Union of North America Local No 702, Laborers International Union of North America Local No 872 and Tommy White
Counter Claimant:
Laborers International Union of North America Local No 872 and Tommy White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
