Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Bellan v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2018cv05102
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Bellan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Almodovar v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2018cv03367
Plaintiff:
Ramon Almodovar
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Koda v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Gene Koda
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Fisher v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05293
Plaintiff:
Alan Fisher
In Re:
Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bannayte v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05292
Plaintiff:
Clifford Bannayte
In Re:
Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Palmquist v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03960
Plaintiff:
Marc Palmquist
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stolz v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03345
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Stolz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Peterson et al v. Ethicon, Inc., et al
as 1:2015cv07356
Defendant:
ABC Corporations, Axtrocare GmbH, Blue Endo and others
Plaintiff:
Ben Peterson, Jr. and Mirriam A. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Considine v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01286
Plaintiff:
Colleen Considine
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Petition for Removal - Product Liability
Cordova et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00351
Plaintiff:
Glen Cordova and Sarah Cordova
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
