Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Heaton v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2014cv02230
Plaintiff:
Dennis Heaton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Heaton v. Smith and Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2013cv03270
Plaintiff:
Dennis Heaton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valencia v. Smith & Nephew, PLC et al
as 1:2013cv00975
Plaintiff:
Carol Valencia
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, PLC and Smith & Nephew, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinton v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 5:2011cv00479
Plaintiff:
Annette Quinton
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee et al v. Smith & Nephew, PLC et al
as 1:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Meggan Garate Lee, Jared Lee, Cynthia Query and others
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, PLC and Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jimenez v. Smith & Nephew PLC et al
as 1:2009cv00416
Plaintiff:
Jose Jimenez, Jose Jimenez and Jose Jimenez
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew PLC, Smith & Nephew PLC and Smith & Nephew, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Dereiux et al v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 5:2008cv00872
Plaintiff:
Kathy Dereiux and Ray Dereiux
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Archuleta et al v. Houseworth et al
as 1:2008cv00962
Plaintiff:
Samantha Archuleta and Rosemarie Carroll
Defendant:
Stephen W. Houseworth, Stephen W. Houseworth, Smith & Nephew, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Hansen v. DJO, Incorporated et al
as 1:2008cv00365
Plaintiff:
Stacey Ann Hansen
Defendant:
DJO, Incorporated, Reable Therapeutics, LLC, I-Flow Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Charles-Cabrera v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as 5:2007cv00707
Plaintiff:
Frances Marion Charles-Cabrera
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
