Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Sinkevitch v. Cain
as 24-2508
Petitioner:
BRETT A. SINKEVITCH
Respondent:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Cufaude v. Therapeutic Level of Care Committee, et al.
as 24-45
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDREW BENTON CUFAUDE
Defendant / Appellee:
THERAPEUTIC LEVEL OF CARE COMMITTEE, Dr. GARTH GULICK, Dr. BYRON D. HEMPHILL and others
Jose Silva v. Brad Cain
as 21-35940
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE PEREZ SILVA
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Eber Gramajo v. Mark Nooth
as 21-35933
Petitioner / Appellant:
EBER GRAMAJO
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendant, Snake River Correctional Institution and MARK NOOTH, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Darryl Galloway v. Mark Nooth
as 21-35796
Petitioner / Appellant:
DARRYL LAMONT GALLOWAY
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional institution
Christopher Gensler v. Brad Cain
as 21-35703
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER ROBIN GENSLER
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Travis Powers v. Brad Cain
as 21-35563
Petitioner / Appellant:
TRAVIS ANTHONY POWERS
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent of Snake River Correctional institution
Shawn Williams v. Brad Cain
as 21-35454
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendant, Snake River Correctional Institution
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN GARY WILLIAMS
Andrew Cufaude v. Brad Cain
as 21-35404
Respondent / Appellee:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDREW BENTON CUFAUDE
Petronilo Chepetla v. Mark Nooth
as 20-35572
Petitioner / Appellant:
PETRONILO ESPINOZA CHEPETLA
Respondent / Appellee:
MARK NOOTH, Superintendent Snake River Correctional Institute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
