Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Spann v. Commissioner
as 8:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Yvette Spann
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
v. Quinto et al
as 8:2024cv00786
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Claimant:
Laura Marie Quinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
v. Quinto et al
as 8:2024cv00787
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Claimant:
Laura Marie Quinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Russell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv00773
Plaintiff:
Brandon Russell
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Santiago v. Commissioner
as 3:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Santiago
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rivera v. Commissioner
as 8:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Kirshia Rivera
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Redd v. Commissioner
as 2:2023cv01104
Plaintiff:
Oliver Redd
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Holmes v. Social Security Commissioner et al
as 9:2023mc80771
In Re:
In re: Derwin Mandell Holmes
Petitioner:
Tyrone T. Holmes
Respondent:
Social Security Commissioner and Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Radnovich v. Commissioner
as 8:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Carole Ann Radnovich
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rivera v. Commissioner
as 3:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Jose Rivera
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
