Cases 71 - 80 of 108
Layton v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00233
Plaintiff:
Vickie J Layton
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Umbach v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
Monica M Umbach
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Stauffacher v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00207
Plaintiff:
Christina L Stauffacher
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thompson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Kalia L Thompson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Selvey v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00197
Plaintiff:
Marcella M Selvey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Parker v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kevin R Parker
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cowen v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00095
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Leannia D Cowen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hagarty v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00079
Petitioner:
Susan L Hagarty
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brandon v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2011cv00080
Plaintiff:
Phyllis A Brandon
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Arner v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2010cv00254
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Michael P Arner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
