Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00759
Plaintiff:
Samantha Jones, Angela Kelley, James Kern and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Gervat v. Raytheon Technologies Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00057
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Marta R. Stewart, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Flaugh et al v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2021cv00037
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
Robert E. Beauchamp, William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Perry Flaugh and Melvyn Klein
Mo v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2020cv01614
Nominal Defendant:
Raytheon Technologies Corporation and Raytheon Company
Defendant:
Ellen M. Pawlikowski, William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work and others
Plaintiff:
Hong Yi Mo
Wann et al v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01507
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work, Stephen J. Hadley and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Wann
Faulkner v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01477
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Robert O. Work, Stephen J. Hadley and others
Plaintiff:
John Faulkner
Printz v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01426
Plaintiff:
Louise Printz
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Ellen M. Pawlikowski, Robert O. Work and others
Kendall v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01423
Defendant:
Dr. Thomas A. Kennedy, Letitia A. Long, Dr. William R. Spivey and others
Plaintiff:
Marion Kendall
Wolf v. Raytheon Company et al
as 1:2019cv01386
Defendant:
William R. Spivey, Dinesh Paliwal, Light Merger Sub, Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolf
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
