Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. iCell Guru Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03539
Petitioner:
Amnun Yusupov, Lyudmila Kateyeve and Wireless Buybacks, LLC
Plaintiff:
Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
iCell Guru Inc. and Daniel Yusupov
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. Yusupov et al
as 1:2015cv04926
Plaintiff:
Sprint Solutions, Inc. and Sprint Communications Company L.P.
Defendant:
Amnun Yusupov and Lyudmila Katayeva
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. 4 U Cell, LLC et al
as 1:2016mc00814
Defendant:
4 U Cell, LLC, Deborah A, Skelly and Dennis Skelly
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. Sam et al
as 1:2015cv04681
Defendant:
Jamila Carry, Iquinda M. Cerisier, Samuel G. Coley and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. Cellular Wholesale Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02997
Defendant:
BDSJ Tech Corp., Kusum Bhatia, Ranjit Bhatia and others
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sprint Solutions, Inc. et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2015cv01801
Defendant:
Min Chen and John or Jane Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Sprint Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Sprint Communications Company L.P. et al v. Jasco Trading, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv05048
Defendant:
Yehudah Bodek, Jasco Trading, Inc., Alan Savdie and others
Plaintiff:
Boost Worldwide, Inc., Sprint Communications Company L.P., Sprint Nextel Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
