Torts - Injury Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Darby v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv06735
Plaintiff: Mary Darby
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2015cv05370
Plaintiff: Ashaki N. Jones
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chaney v. Starbucks Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv07013
Plaintiff: John Chaney
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shriram et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02142
Plaintiff: Krishna Shriram and Anitha Shriram
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation , 1301 Properties Owner LLC and 1301 Properties Owner LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hament v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2013cv02229
Plaintiff: Nancy J. Hament
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Batista v. Starbucks Corporation
as 1:2012cv06182
Plaintiff: Andres Batista
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Inanli v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv05184
Plaintiff: Zeynep Inanli
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Store
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stafford v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2010cv03509
Plaintiff: Cecelia Stafford
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation and Jon Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodley v. Massachusetts Mutual Etc. et al
as 1:2008cv00949
Plaintiff: Andrea Woodley
Defendant: Massachusetts Mutual Etc. and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Notice of Removal
Iovane v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al
as 1:2008cv00016
Plaintiff: Joseph Iovane
Defendant: Starbucks Coffee Company and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?