Cases 41 - 50 of 214
CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC. et al v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2020cv02529
Defendant:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, COSMO SERVIDIO, ANDREW WHEELER and others
Plaintiff:
MARYLAND WATERMEN'S ASSOCIATION, INC., CHESAPEAKE BAY FOUNDATION, INC., ROBERT WHITESCARVER and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
STATE OF MARYLAND et al v. WHEELER et al
as 1:2020cv02530
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF MARYLAND, STATE OF DELAWARE and others
Defendant:
ANDREW WHEELER, COSMO SERVIDIO and UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Petitioner:
STATE OF NEW YORK and NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 181 Environment: Review of Agency Action
State of Maryland, et al v. EDUC, et al
as 20-5268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
People of the State of California, ex rel. Xavier Becerra, Attorney General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, State of Rhode Island and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Elisabeth Devos, in her official capacity as Secretary of Education and United States Department of Education
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of New York, State of Vermont, Commonwealth of Virginia, ex rel. Mark R. Herring, Attorney General and others
STATE OF NEW YORK et al v. DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02340
Plaintiff:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, CITY OF NEW YORK, STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, LOUIS DEJOY and DONALD J. TRUMP
Amicus Curiae:
RON WYDEN, TOM CARPER, BERNARD SANDERS and others
Petitioner:
THIRTY LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS, COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and CITY OF COLUMBUS
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1265
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner:
Erie County, State of New Jersey, State of Illinois and others
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al
as 20-7062
Plaintiff:
United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party:
State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Elizabeth W. Kennedy
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01719
Plaintiff:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant:
ELISABETH D. DEVOS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1167
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency, James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others
Petitioner:
State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. James Owens, et al
as 20-1169
Petitioner:
Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Public Citizen, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
State of Minnesota, City and County of Denver, State of Vermont and others
Respondent:
James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
State of New York, et al v. EPA, et al
as 20-1164
Petitioner:
People of the State of Michigan, State of Vermont, State of California and others
Respondent:
Andrew Wheeler, as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Protection Agency and Susan Parker Bodine, as Assistant Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
