Cases 71 - 80 of 145
Ersedo-Williams v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01414
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Glenda Ersedo-Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maloney v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01413
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Marlene Maloney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duncan v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv01412
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp. and Stryker Corporation
Plaintiff:
Christopher Duncan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cannova v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv06350
Plaintiff:
Dominic Cannova
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation and Stryker Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Spangler et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01407
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Douglas Spangler and Rose Spangler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rodene v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01406
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Robert Rodene
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Angus et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01405
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Holly Angus and William Angus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dwyer v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01399
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
David Dwyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hilsenhoff et al v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01402
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Gary Hilsenhoff and Marilyn Hilsenhoff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mckinley v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01401
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff:
Vicki Mckinley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
