Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Ohr v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO
as 1:2018cv08414
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 150, AFL-CIO
Counter Defendant:
National Labor Relations Board and Peter Robb
Yoo v. Studio of Master's Touch, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Sung Teak Yoo
Defendant:
Studio of Master's Touch, Inc., David Jang and In Jae Moon
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ohr v. PAS LLC
as 1:2017cv04500
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
PAS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ohr v. MTIL, Inc.
as 1:2017cv02656
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
MTIL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
You et al v. Wild Symphony, LLC. et al
as 1:2016cv10293
Plaintiff:
Kwan Og You , Sung Joon Ahn and Young Hee Yang
Defendant:
Wild Symphony, LLC , Byung J Sung and Francisca J Jung
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Ohr v. EFN OBT1 LLC et al
as 1:2016cv09018
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Defendant:
EFN OBT1 LLC , North American Automotive Services, Inc. and Nai Hiffman Asset Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Peter Sung Ohr v. Arlington Metals Corporation
as 1:2015cv08885
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Respondent:
Arlington Metals Corporation
Movant:
United Steel, Paper And Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial And Service Workers International Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ohr v. Latino Express, Inc.
as 1:2013cv09123
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Defendant:
Latino Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Ohr v. Napleton Arlington Heights Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
as 1:2013cv07684
Defendant:
Napleton Arlington Heights Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram
Plaintiff:
Peter Sung Ohr
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Peter Sung Ohr, v. Nexeo Solutions, LLC
as 1:2012cv01226
Respondent:
Nexeo Solutions, LLC
Petitioner:
Peter Sung Ohr
Amicu:
Teamsters Local Union 705
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 160
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
