Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Pemmie et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00807
Plaintiff:
Stephon Pemmie, Byron Pena, Megan Peppers and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
LivaNova USA, Inc. v. Medical Science Partners II, L.P. et al
as 1:2022cv00733
Defendant:
DSS Financial, Medical Science Partners II, L.P., New Medical Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
LivaNova USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Flannery v. Zoom Video Communications, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01512
Plaintiff:
Suzanne Flannery
Defendant:
Eric S. Yuan, Kelly Steckelberg, Dan Scheinman and others
Nominal Defendant:
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hull v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01517
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Clay M. Gaspar, Richard E. Muncrief and others
Plaintiff:
William Hull
Wang v. WPX Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01504
Defendant:
Kimberly S. Lubel, Richard E. Muncrief, Kelt Kindick and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Wolf v. Montage Resources Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv01324
Defendant:
Southwestern Energy Company, D. Martin Phillips, Richard Paterson and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Wolf
Anderson v. Chadwick et al
as 1:2020cv01023
Defendant:
Eric S. Yuan, Bart Swanson, Carl M. Eschenbach and others
Nominal Defendant:
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sara Anderson
Gervat v. Yuan et al
as 1:2020cv00797
Defendant:
Eric S. Yuan, Bart Swanson, Carl M. Eschenbach and others
Nominal Defendant:
Zoom Video Communications, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01099
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Archer et al v. Defenders, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00470
Plaintiff:
Teddy Archer , Sedetric Chambliss , Ervin Desir and others
Defendant:
Defenders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
