Real Property Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Myah Hicks v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC, et al
as 22-13969
Plaintiff / Appellant: MYAH HICKS
Defendant / Appellee: MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC, TAKATA CORPORATION and TRW AIRBAGS
Not Classified By Court: SERVICE
Dr. Abdullah Shamshir Bin Abd Mokti v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv21856
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Honda Motor Co. Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Dr. Abdullah Shamshir Bin Abd Mokti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pielago v. Takata Corporation
as 1:2016cv21835
Plaintiff: Adrian Antonio Pielago
Defendant: Takata Corporation and American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Young et al v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20686
Plaintiff: Bonnie W Young and Charles E. Calhoun, Sr.
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Leger v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20700
Defendant: Takata Corporation , TK Holdings Inc. , Honda Motor Co. Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Monte Leger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ahmadi d/b/a Southeast Enterprises, et al. v. Takata Corporation, et al.
as 1:2015cv20671
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc., Highland Industries, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Ahmadi d/b/a Southeast Enterprises, Hassan Ahmadi doing business as SOUTHEAST ENTERPRISES and John Henry Ellis, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Morales Ramos v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv20264
Plaintiff: Miguel A Morales Ramos
Defendant: Takata Corporation, Takata, Inc., TK Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Clow v. Takata Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv24497
Defendant: Takata Corporation, TK Holdings, Inc., HIGHLAND INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Richard Clow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?