Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Qwest Corporation v. FCC
as 08-1257
Petitioner:
Qwest Corporation
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Verizon
Intervenor For Respondent:
Arizona Corporation Commission, COMPTEL, CP Telecom, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Minnesota Public Utilities Commission
Verizon Telephone Companies v. FCC
as 08-1012
Petitioner:
Verizon Telephone Companies
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Respondent:
Covad Communications Group, Inc., NuVox, Inc., XO Communications Inc. and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Qwest Communications International Inc. and Qwest Corporation
Amicus Curiae For Respondent:
Full Service Computing Corporation, doing business as Full Service Network
Covad Comm Co, et al v. FCC, et al
as 05-1095
Petitioner:
Covad Communications Company and Dieca Communications, Inc., doing business as Covad Communications Company
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Terminated Party:
AT&T Corporation, ATX Licensing, Inc., Curry Communications, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Ciena Corporation, Time Warner Telecom, Inc., Promoting Active Competition Everywhere Coalition and others
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Line Systems, Inc. and ATX Communications, Inc.
US Telecom Assn, et al v. FCC, et al
as 00-1012
Petitioner:
United States Telecom Association
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission and United States of America
Intervenor For Petitioner:
Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Bell Atlantic-Delaware, Inc., Bell Atlantic-Maryland, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
AT&T Corporation, Covad Communications Company, Network Access Solutions Corp. and others
Terminated Party:
US WEST Communications, Inc., NorthPoint Communications, Inc., MCI WorldCom, Inc. and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
