Cases 11 - 20 of 9,403
In re: Jorge Mojocoa
as 24-11029
Petitioner:
In re: JORGE MOJOCOA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Apatel, LLC, et al v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Apatel, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company d/b/a Quick Mart and Aratiben Patel
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2023 Review of Findings of Dept. of Agriculture
Owens v. United States of America
as 6:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Jordan Owens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Antitrust
Walter JonesIn re: Walter Jones
as 24-10989
Petitioner:
In re: WALTER LEE JONES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Shawn WilliamsIn re: Shawn Williams
as 24-10894
Petitioner:
In re: SHAWN LASHAY WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Florida Agency for Health Care Administration, et al v. Administrator for the Centers for Medicare & Medic, et al
as 24-10875
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION and STATE OF FLORIDA
Defendant:
ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, SECRETARY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
In re: Daniel Rodriguez
as 24-10823
Petitioner:
In re: DANIEL A. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
In re: Multimedia Holdings Corporation
as 24-10783
Petitioner:
In re: MULTIMEDIA HOLDINGS CORPORATION
Respondent:
AARON ZAHN, RYAN WANNEMACHER and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Sarmiento v. United States of America Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 8:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Tricia Sarmiento
Defendant:
United States of America Department of Housing and Urban Development and Assistant Secretary of Housing and Federal Housing Commissioner of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kelsey CoffeeIn re: Kelsey Coffee
as 24-10740
Petitioner:
In re: KELSEY VIDEL COFFEE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
