Cases 11 - 17 of 17
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of MACO Construction Services, Inc. v. Penick Nordic JV, et al.
as 2:2017cv02165
Defendant:
Penick Nordic JV and Western Surety Company
Plaintiff:
United States of America for the use and benefit of MACO Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America for the use and benefit of American General Construction Inc. et al v. Yack Construction, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01994
Plaintiff:
American General Construction, Inc. and United States of America for the use and benefit of American General Construction Inc.
Defendant:
Merchants Bonding Company (Mutual) and Yack Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. R L Reed, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01379
Defendant:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company and R L Reed, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 2:2013cv00400
Defendant:
Granite Petroleum, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
United States of America v. Alliance Mechanical, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01088
Defendant:
Alliance Mechanical, Inc., Alliance/Penta, A JV, Federal Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Benchmark Contracting, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00736
Defendant:
Benchmark Contracting, Inc. and Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Concrete Solutions, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Thomas Floors, Inc v. US Builders Company et al
as 2:2010cv02045
Defendant:
Nellis Airforce Space, U.S. Department of Defense, US Builders Company and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Floors, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
