Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Perez v. Jeffs et al
as 2:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Lyle Jeffs, Dale Barlow and Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0206
Perez v. Stewart Environmental Consultants, LLC
as 1:2015cv01509
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Stewart Environmental Consultants, LLC, David Stewart and Stewart Environmental Consultants LLC 401(K) Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez et al v. Fog River et al
as 2:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez and United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
Fog River and John Bowen
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Perez v. Kasim
as 4:2015cv00392
Plaintiff:
Thomas E Perez
Defendant:
Isam Kasim
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. Branch 504, National Association of Letter Carriers
as 1:2015cv00391
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Branch 504, National Association of Letter Carriers and David F. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. et al v. Perez et al
as 1:2014cv00028
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Entertainment (Overseas) Investment, Ltd. and Man Kwan
Defendant:
Thomas E. Perez, David Weil, Ruben Rosalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perez v. Dill
as 1:2014mc00044
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Perez
Respondent:
Walter Dill
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Perez v. Local 1001, Amalgmated Transit Union
as 1:2014cv02286
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Local 1001, Amalgmated Transit Union
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
Perez v. Estate of Robert Talley et al
as 1:2014cv01786
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Estate of Richard Talley, The and American Title Services Retirement Trust
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Perez v. Stone Castle et al
as 1:2014cv00066
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
Stone Castle and Anthony Stoddard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
