Cases 31 - 40 of 227
Tech Data Corporation et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 8:2017cv00944
Plaintiff:
Tech Data Corporation , Tech Data Product Management, Inc. , Christopher Donnelly and others
Defendant:
Hitachi Ltd. , Hitachi Displays, Ltd. , Hitachi America, Ltd. and others
Pecial_master:
Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Electrograph Systems, Inc. et al v. Hitachi Ltd. et al
as 2:2017cv02365
Defendant:
Irico Group Corporation, Samsung SDI Co., LTD., Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Viewsonic Corporation, Jimmy Jahar Thule and others
Not Classified By Court:
YRC Inc. and Jeffrey M. YRC, Inc.
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Schultze Agency Services, LLC et al v. Hitachi, Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv02363
Defendant:
Beijing Matsushita Color Crt Company, LTD., Chunghwa Picture Tubes (Malaysia), Chunghwa Picture Tubes, LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Breivik, Christopher Donnelly, Richard Reid and others
Special Master:
Honorable Charles A. Legge
Unknown:
Helen Cho Eckert, Gary L. Halling, James Landon McGinnis and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
P.C. Richard & Son Long Island Corporation et al v. Technicolor SA et al
as 2:2017cv02367
Plaintiff:
ABC Appliance, Inc., Edward Breivik, Christopher Donnelly and others
Defendant:
Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Mitsubishi Electric Visual Solutions America, Inc. and others
Unknown:
Molly McGrail Powers, Molly McGrail Powers and Molly McGrail Powers
Interested Party:
Toshiba America , Inc, Toshiba America Consumer Products, L.L.C., Toshiba America Electronics Components, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15598
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
COOPER & KIRKHAM, P.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba America, Inc., et al
as 17-15597
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
LAW OFFICE OF BRIAN BARRY
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 17-15496
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Objector - Appellant:
FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA and LAW OFFICES OF FRANCIS O. SCARPULLA
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Marta Cooperative of America, v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16982
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTA COOPERATIVE OF AMERICA, INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16427
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
In re: Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. Toshiba Corporation, et al
as 16-16400
:
In re: CATHODE RAY TUBE (CRT) ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
INDIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS
Defendant - Appellee:
TOSHIBA CORPORATION, TOSHIBA AMERICA, INC., TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION SYSTEMS, INC. and others
Movant - Appellant:
ANTHONY GIANASCA, GLORIA COMEAUX, MINA ASHKANNEJHAD, individually and/or as Administrator of the Estate of the Late R. Deryl Edwards, Jr. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
