Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Dolores Mandrigues, et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, NA
as 13-17234
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Defendant - Appellant:
WELLS FARGO BANK, NA, successor to by merger with Wells Fargo Bank Southwest, NA, FKA Wachovia Mortgage, FSB, FKA World Savings Bank, FSB
Real-party-in-interest - Appellee:
CHAN PHARN, CHRISTINA ZAKO, PAUL MCDERMED and others
Nathaniel Dayton, et al v. World Savings, Inc., et al
as 11-16510
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Objector - Appellant:
NATHANIEL C. DAYTON, STEPHEN B. FINE and ARIEL BROOKMAN FINE
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD SAVINGS, INC., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, AKA Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Donald Smith, et al v. World Savings, Inc., et al
as 11-16513
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Objector - Appellant:
DONALD SMITH, JAMES RUDOLPH, ROBERT E. FLORES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD SAVINGS, INC., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, AKA Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Marcella Rose, et al v. World Savings, Inc., et al
as 11-16507
:
In re: WACHOVIA CORP. "PICK-A-PAYMENT" MORTGAGE MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOLORES MANDRIGUES, JUANITA JONES, AL F. MINYEN and others
Objector - Appellant:
MARCELLA M. ROSE
Defendant - Appellee:
WORLD SAVINGS, INC., WORLD SAVINGS BANK, FSB, WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB, AKA Wachovia Mortgage, a division of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
