Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Trustees of the Northern Nevada Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al
as 3:2018cv00455
Defendant:
Premier Scaffold, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Construction Workers Vacation Savings Trust Plan, Trustees of the Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern Nevada, Trustees of the Northern Nevada Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Trustees of the Northern Nevada Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al
as 3:2017cv00577
Plaintiff:
Kevin Albanese, Dave Backman, Jesse Barajas and others
Defendant:
Allegheny Casualty Company, Diversified Concrete Cutting, Inc. and Specialty Contracting Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Northern Nevada Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Diversified Concrete Cutting, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00070
Defendant:
Allegheny Casualty Company, Diversified Concrete Cutting, Inc. and Specialty Contracting Company
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Cement Masons Annuity Trust Fund for Northern Nevada, Trustees of the Cement Masons Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust Fund, Trustees of the Construction Workers Vacation Savings Trust Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Trustee of the Northern Nevada, et al v. Randy's Blasting, Inc., et al
as 13-15612
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRUSTEE OF THE NORTHERN NEVADA LABORERS HEALTH & WELFARE TRUST FUND, TRUSTEES OF THE LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND FOR NORTHERN NEVADA, TRUSTEES OF THE CONSTRUCTION WORKERS VACATION SAVINGS TRUST PLAN and others
Appellant:
JERRY C. CARTER, Esq.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY'S BLASTING, INC., a California corporation, AKA Western Blasting Technologies, Inc., MESSER CONSTRUCTION, INC., a California corporation and RANDY L. MESSER, DBA Messer Construction, DBA Randy's Blasting, DBA Western Blasting Technologies
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
