Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Campbell v. Financial Recovery Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv60517
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Financial Recovery Services, Inc. , Brian Charles Bowers , Mark J. Patin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Campbell v. Pollack & Rosen, P.A. et al
as 0:2012cv62119
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Pollack & Rosen, P.A. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Campbell v. Nationwide Credit, Inc.
as 0:2011cv61934
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Nationwide Credit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. Superior Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv61932
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Superior Asset Management, Inc. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. Credit Control, LLC
as 0:2011cv61565
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Credit Control, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC
as 1:2011cv22215
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Leading Edge Recovery Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Campbell v. Enhanced Recovery Corporation
as 1:2009cv21935
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Enhanced Recovery Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Campbell v. National Asset Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2009cv21580
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
National Asset Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Campbell v. Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv20998
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Palisades Acquisition XVI, LLC, Robert J. Orovitz, P.A., Robert J. Orovitz and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Campbell v. Simm Associates, Inc.
as 1:2007cv23099
Plaintiff:
Taneike Y. Campbell
Defendant:
Simm Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
