Cases filed in New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Cohen v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 6:2022cv06395
Plaintiff: Mark A Cohen
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company and BP America Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Amerada Hess Corp. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00312
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Commisisoner of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, The Administrator of the New Jersey Spill Compensation Fund and others
Defendant: Amerada Hess Corp., Rosemore Inc., Getty Properties Corp. and others
3Rd Party Defendant: Harbans Singh, Gurmail Singh and John and Jane Does Nos. 1-100
Not Classified By Court: Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc.
Cross Defendant: H.P. Delta, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Robert Melecci and Dhandi Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Patrick County School Board v. Amerada Hess Corporation
as 1:2004cv02070
Defendant: BP Amoco Chemical Company, El Paso Corporation, Getty Properties Corporation and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: Patrick County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City of Lowell Massachusetts v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2005cv04018
Defendant: Exxon Mobil Corp, doing business as Exxon Mobile Refining and Supply Company doing business as Exxon Chemical USA doing business as ExxonMobil Chemical Corporation formerly known as Exxon Corporation, Atlantic Richfield Company individually also known as Arco formerly known as Arco Petroleum Company doing business as Arco Products Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. individually formerly known as Gulf Oil Corporation doing business as Chevron Products Company doing business as Chevron Chemical Company and others
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: City of Lowell Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
City of Fresno v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2004cv04973
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Plaintiff: City of Fresno
Defendant: Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Chevron USA Inc., Chevron Enviromental Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Coraopolis Water And Sewer Authority v. Ashland, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv07874
Plaintiff: Coraopolis Water and Sewer Authority
Cross Defendant: Ashland, Inc., Sunoco, Inc. (R&M), Sunoco, Inc. and others
Defendant: Chevron Corporation, Coastal Oil New England, ConocoPhillips Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
The City of New York v. Amerada Hess Corp.
as 1:2004cv03417
Defendant: El Paso CGP Company doing business as Coastal Oil New York, Inc. formerly known as Coastal Corporation, TRMI Holdings Inc., Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC and others
Plaintiff: Water Finance Agency, The Water Board and The City of New York
Petitioner: Gary Stumpf, Thomas M Milton, Meena Nainan and others
Material Witne: Barker Hamill
Special Master: Ronald J. Hedges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania V. Exxon Mobil Corporation, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv06228
Plaintiff: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
Defendant: Exxon Mobile Corporation , ExxonMobile Oil Corporation , American Refining group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
Hinesburg, Town of v. Atlantic Richfield Company et al
as 1:2013cv07271
Plaintiff: Hinesburg, Town of
Defendant: Atlantic Richfield Company, BP Amoco Chemical Company, BP Products North America Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Manning v. Ashland Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv07272
Plaintiff: City of Manning
Defendant: Ashland Inc. , Atlantic Richfield Company, BP Amoco Chemical Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?