Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Antoine et al v. Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv06637
Plaintiff:
Alfretta Antoine, Shannon Cave, Christina Forney and others
Defendant:
Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc., The Board of Trustees of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., The Marsh & McLennan Companies Benefits Administration Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Newell Operating Company U.S. Benefits Administration Committee v. Marino et al
as 1:2019cv09902
Plaintiff:
Newell Operating Company U.S. Benefits Administration Committee, in its Capacity as Plan Administrator for the Newell Brands Medical Plan and Newell Operating Company U.S. Benefits Administration Committee
Defendant:
Shafran & Rock, PLLC and Amy Marino
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Koral v. The HSBC North America (U.S.) Consolidated Health and Welfare Plan
as 1:2016cv00266
Plaintiff:
Edmund Koral
Defendant:
The HSBC North America (U.S.) Consolidated Health and Welfare Plan, HSBC North America (U.S.) Benefits Administrative Committee and Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bennett-Brady v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2014cv00635
Plaintiff:
Sharon Bennett-Brady
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company, The Quest Diagnostics' Long Term Disability Benefit Plan, The Quest Employees Benefits Administration Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Terrazas et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03068
Plaintiff:
Joanne Terrazas and Diane Borgna
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation , the Benefits Administration Committee , ROBERT PEREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Sansano v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv03069
Plaintiff:
ISABEL F. SANSANO
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation , the Benefits Administration Committee , ROBERT PEREGO and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
In Re: Bank of New York Mellon Corporation Foreign Exchange Transactions Litigation
as 1:2012md02335
Defendant:
Arthur Certosimo, Michael J. Kowalski, Samuel C. Scott, III and others
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Municipal Police Employees' Retirement System, Lisa Parker, Los Angeles Department of Water and Power Retirement Plan and others
Claimant:
Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bechtel Corporation, SYNNEX Corporation and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Ohio Police & Fire Pension Fund, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, United States Of America and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Bart Florence, Paul Bensi, Jerry Kalmer and others
Petitioner:
Union Asset Management Holding AG, Ironworkers Locals 40, 361 & 417 - Union Security Funds, DeKalb County Pension Fund and others
Interested Party:
David Nichols
Nominal Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Non-Party June Kim
Lead Plaintiff:
State of Oregon By and Through the Oregon State Treasurer on Behalf of the Common School Fund and, Together with the Oregon Public Employee Retirement Board, on Behalf of the Oregon Public Employee Re
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Civil Enforcement of Employee Benefits
Thurber v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Sharon Thurber
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance Company, Quest Diagnostics, Incorporated Welfare Plan and The Quest Employee Benefits Administration Committee
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miner v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2009cv01017
Plaintiff:
Alan Miner, Alan Miner and Alan Miner
Defendant:
American Express Company, Kenneth I. Chenault, Daniel F. Akerson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Tang v. American Express Company et al
as 1:2008cv11301
Plaintiff:
Kam K. Tang
Defendant:
American Express Company, Kenneth I. Chenault, Daniel F. Akerson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
