Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Janet Marcusse v. United States Department of Ju, et al
as 14-5099
Plaintiff - Appellant: Janet Mavis Marcusse
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Justice Office of Information and Privacy, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Janet Marcusse v. United States Department of Ju, et al
as 14-5100
Plaintiff - Appellant: Janet Mavis Marcusse
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Justice Office of Information and Privacy, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Janet Marcusse v. DOJ Office of Info. & Privacy, et al
as 14-5073
Plaintiff - Appellant: Janet Mavis Marcusse
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Justice Office of Information and Privacy, Executive Office for United States Attorneys, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION et al v. FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2013cv02050
Plaintiff: AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION , CB&T BANCSHARES, INC. , CITIZENS BANK & TRUST COMPANY and others
Defendant: FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION , OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY and BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
American Bankers Association, et al v. FRS, et al
as 13-1310
Petitioner: American Bankers Association, CB&T Bancshares, Inc., Citizens Bank & Trust Company and others
Respondent: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
RICHTER et al v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2013cv01517
Plaintiff: JESSICA RICHTER
Defendant: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM and FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
NACS, et al v. FRS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5270
Plaintiff - Appellee: NACS, formerly known as National Association of Convenience Stores, National Retail Federation, Food Marketing Institute and others
Defendant - Appellant: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al
as 13-5248
Plaintiff - Appellee: State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellant: State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury and ex officio Chairman of the Financial Stability Oversight Council, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
State Natl Bank of Big Spring, et al v. Jacob Lew, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-5247
Plaintiff - Appellant: State National Bank of Big Spring, 60 Plus Association, Inc. and Competitive Enterprise Institute
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of South Carolina, State of Oklahoma, State of Michigan and others
Defendant - Appellee: Jacob J. Lew, In his official capacity as United States Secretary of the Treasury, United States Department of the Treasury, Richard Cordray, In his official capacity as Director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, in his official capacity as ex officio Director of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and in his official capacity as ex officio member of the Finan and others
GOLDSTEIN v. BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
as 1:2013mc00445
Petitioner: CHARLES R. GOLDSTEIN
Respondent: BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
Movant: FDIC AS RECEIVER FOR K BANK
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?