Cases 21 - 30 of 150
Betten Chevrolet, Inc. v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4114
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
BETTEN CHEVROLET, INC.
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Natural Products Association v. OSHA
as 21-4108
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NATURAL PRODUCTS ASSOCIATION
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
KY Petroleum Marketers Assoc., et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4117
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
KENTUCKY PETROLEUM MARKETERS ASSOCIATION, KENTUCKY TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF CONVENIENCE STORES and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Oberg Industries, LLC v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4112
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
OBERG INDUSTRIES, LLC
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, US Department of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health Administration
RNC v. OSHA
as 21-4082
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DTN Staffing, Inc., et al v. OSHA
as 21-4101
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
DTN STAFFING, INC., JAMIE FLECK, SADIE HAWS and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Union of American Physicians v. OSHA
as 21-4085
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
UNION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Natl Assn of Broadcast Empl, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4087
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS, THE BROADCASTING AND CABLE TELEVISION WORKERS SECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 51, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Assoc Gen Contr of America Inc, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4086
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC., AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION and SIGNATORY WALL AND CEILING CONTRACTORS ALLIANCE
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
MA Bldg Trades Cncl, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4084
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
