Cases 21 - 30 of 151
Heritage Foundation v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4149
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
HERITAGE FOUNDATION
Respondent:
DOUGLAS L. PARKER, OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARTIN J. WALSH
Amicus Curiae:
OHIO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, OHIO AUTOMOBILE DEALERS ASSOCIATION, OHIO WHOLESALE BEER AND WINE ASSOCIATION and others
Aaron Abadi v. OSHA
as 21-4133
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
AARON ABADI
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
RNC v. OSHA
as 21-4082
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DTN Staffing, Inc., et al v. OSHA
as 21-4101
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
DTN STAFFING, INC., JAMIE FLECK, SADIE HAWS and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Union of American Physicians v. OSHA
as 21-4085
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
UNION OF AMERICAN PHYSICIANS AND DENTISTS
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Natl Assn of Broadcast Empl, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4087
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF BROADCAST EMPLOYEES & TECHNICIANS, THE BROADCASTING AND CABLE TELEVISION WORKERS SECTOR OF THE COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, LOCAL 51, AFL-CIO
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
KY Petroleum Marketers Assoc., et al v. OSHA, et al
as 21-4117
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
KENTUCKY PETROLEUM MARKETERS ASSOCIATION, KENTUCKY TRUCKING ASSOCIATION, MICHIGAN ASSOCIATION OF CONVENIENCE STORES and others
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor and DOUGLAS L. PARKER, Assistant Secretary, U.S. Department of Labor
Assoc Gen Contr of America Inc, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4086
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF AMERICA, INC., AMERICAN ROAD AND TRANSPORTATION BUILDERS ASSOCIATION and SIGNATORY WALL AND CEILING CONTRACTORS ALLIANCE
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
MA Bldg Trades Cncl, et al v. OSHA
as 21-4084
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
MASSACHUSETTS BUILDING TRADES COUNCIL
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
State of Indiana v. OSHA
as 21-4090
Not Classified By Court:
In re: MCP NO. 165., OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION RULE ON COVID-19 VACCINATION AND TESTING, 86 FED. REG. 61402
Petitioner:
STATE OF INDIANA
Respondent:
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH ADMINISTRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
