Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Satco Products, Inc. v. The Regents of the University of California
as 2:2020cv04956
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of California
Plaintiff:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Kurin v. Balter
as 7:2020cv04613
Defendant:
Michael Balter
Plaintiff:
Danielle Kurin
Petitioner:
The Regents of the University of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lb
Satco Products, Inc. v. The Regents of the University of California
as 2:2019cv06444
Defendant:
The Regents of the University of California
Plaintiff:
Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
The Regents of the University of California v. American International Group, Inc et al
as 1:2014cv01270
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc , Martin J. Sullivan, Steven J. Bensinger and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The Regents of the University of California v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv05186
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California
Defendant:
Bank of America Corporation, Bank of America, N.A., Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Montana Board of Investments et al
as 1:2012cv08379
Plaintiff:
Montana Board of Investments , Teacher Retirement System of Texas , California Public Employees' Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Henry A. McKinnell, John L. LaMattina and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
The Authors Guild, Inc. et al v. Hathitrust et al
as 1:2011cv06351
Plaintiff:
The Authors Guild, Inc. , The Australian Society Of Authors Limited , Union Des Ecrivaines Et Des Ecrivains Quebecois and others
Defendant:
Hathitrust, The Regents Of The University Of Michigan, The Regents of the University of California and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
