Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Robert Smith v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv05946
Plaintiff:
Robert Smith
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Loanshop, Love with shop and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
LVMH Swiss Manufactures SA et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02296
Plaintiff:
LVMH Swiss Manufactures SA and Hublot SA
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A B C Store, Ali watches wholesale and retail Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Run-Tiger LLC v. The individuals, corporations, limited liability companies, partnerships, and unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A to the Complaint
as 1:2023cv00774
Plaintiff:
RUN-TIGER LLC, d/b/a RUN-CHICKEN and Run-Tiger LLC doing business as Run-Chicken
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A TO THE COMPLAINT, Dezhou Jifeng Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. (1), Guigang Qingyun Pingtianshan Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (2) and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Shortcake IP Holdings LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00407
Plaintiff:
Shortcake IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ACLE Store, Art&Life Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc. v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2022cv05864
Plaintiff:
Ubisoft Entertainment, S.A. and Ubisoft, Inc.
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A Hereto, 2022 New store Store, 3D clothing source manufacturers Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
MERCIS B.V. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv05831
Plaintiff:
MERCIS B.V.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Adorkable Doll House Store, An Attitude Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
EnchantedMob, Inc. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv03431
Plaintiff:
EnchantedMob, Inc.
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, ahnfk-us, beisisi-us and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 v. Does 1-476, as Identified in Exhibit 2
as 1:2022cv02078
Plaintiff:
Trademark Holder Identified in Exhibit 1 and Snapperz.com LLC
Defendant:
Does 1-476, as Identified in Exhibit 2, Doe 1 cwmsports Store, Doe 2 dhsupseller Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Diggs v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Robert Diggs
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Oeteldonk Official Store, Shop1333406 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Fear of God, LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2022cv00314
Plaintiff:
Fear of God, LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Shenzhen Ai-Mich Science And Technology Limited, Quanzhou Chuanhe Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
