Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Boyce v. Spruce Power Holding Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv08591
Plaintiff:
Toby Boyce
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Ledecky, Brian Piern, Thomas J. Hynes III and others
Nominal Defendant:
Spruce Power Holding Corporation
Jiang v. Avaya Holdings Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv01258
Plaintiff:
Oliver Jiang
Defendant:
Avaya Holdings Corp., James M. Chirico, Jr. and Kieran J. McGrath
Petitioner:
Tareq Salah, Samba Yarlagadda, Paul Sweatt and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Todd Sievers
Hoy v. Andrews Wharton, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00122
Plaintiff:
Toby Edward Hoy
Defendant:
Andrews Wharton, Inc. doing business as Healthy Access
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Carlisle v. Shift Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09732
Plaintiff:
Samuel Carlisle
Defendant:
Shift Technologies, Inc., George Arison, Toby Russell and others
Jacobs v. BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv09718
Defendant:
Paul Gitman, Paul Wegman, BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jacobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05618
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Azzopardi v. BioSpecifics Technologies Corp. et al
as 1:2020cv05417
Defendant:
Paul Gitman, BioSpecifics Technologies Corp., Michael Schamroth and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Azzopardi
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04206
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv03349
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02750
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
