Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Sunstone Engineering v. Pepe Tools
as 2:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Sunstone Engineering
Defendant:
Pepe Tools Inc.; an Oklahoma corporation doing business as Pepetools, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Cornwell Quality Tools v. Woods et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Cornwell Quality Tools
Defendant:
Shane Woods, Marylou Woods, Woods Family Tools and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Love-Less Ash et al v. Asia Pacific Construction et al
as 2:2018cv00595
Defendant:
Tool4Stone, Power and Abrasive Tools Store, Kyle Cranfill and others
Plaintiff:
Dustless Depot and Love-Less Ash
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
Young Living Essential Oils v. Essential Tools, The
as 2:2016cv00636
Plaintiff:
Young Living Essential Oils
Defendant:
Essential Tools, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Power Line Industries v. Spartan Tool
as 2:2016cv00242
Plaintiff:
Power Line Industries
Defendant:
Spartan Tool
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Dustless Depot et al v. Applied Diamond Tools
as 2:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dustless Depot and Love-Less Ash
Defendant:
Applied Diamond Tools
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Dustless Depot et al v. DAMO Diamond Tools
as 2:2015cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dustless Depot and Love-Less Ash
Defendant:
DAMO Diamond Tools
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
GSL Holdings v. UPM Marketing et al
as 2:2011cv00336
Plaintiff:
GSL Holdings
Defendant:
UPM Marketing, Electronic Educational Devices, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
RG Properties v. UPM Marketing et al
as 2:2011cv00317
Plaintiff:
RG Properties
Defendant:
UPM Marketing, Electronic Educational Devices, Amazon.com and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Optic Tools v. Wal-Mart Stores
as 2:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
Optic Tools
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
