Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2025cv05560
Plaintiff:
Sony Interactive Entertainment LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, A14IM916ULMFCF, A1RB2TCPCK12WX and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited v. The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto
as 1:2024cv07059
Defendant:
The Individuals, Corporations, Limited Liability Companies, Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A Hereto, allr6828, 47356_y3xym and others
Plaintiff:
Hong Kong Leyuzhen Technology Co. Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Fendi S.R.L. v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated associations identified on Schedule A
as 1:2024cv03895
Plaintiff:
Fendi S.R.L. and designer_bag990 Store
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A, The Partnerships and Unicorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, a31415930 Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Metzfab Industries, LLC et al v. THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS,LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES,PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
as 1:2023cv23867
Plaintiff:
Metzfab Industries, LLC and Brandon Metzger
Defendant:
THE INDIVIDUALS, CORPORATIONS, LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, Acupress, ATQUALOD and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271 Patent Infringement
Shortcake IP Holdings LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04884
Plaintiff:
Shortcake IP Holdings LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Shenzhen Yingii Industry Co., Ltd., Xiamen Rainbow Gifts& Packs Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Parfums Christian Dior v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv04469
Plaintiff:
Parfums Christian Dior
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Guangzhou Woen Cosmetics Co., Ltd., Quanzhou Fengze Hanhao Trading Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
DUENAS v. The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A.
as 1:2023cv21365
Plaintiff:
NORMAN DUENAS
Defendant:
The Individuals, Partnerships, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A., Banggood, gor2don Store and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Diggs v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv06111
Plaintiff:
Robert Diggs
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, The sea of stars-US, TNGYUNXIA Poster and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv04995
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, yunchangshijiafushigongsi, Changshu Zhengtai Textiles Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Peanuts Worldwide LLC v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2022cv02951
Plaintiff:
Peanuts Worldwide LLC
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Chongqing Mr Panda Technology Co., Dongguan Dihao Clothing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
